Introduction
Delhi’s Arun Jaitley Stadium—also recorded in older scorecards as Feroz Shah Kotla—has produced a wide range of one-day cricket rather than one simple batting label. The inspected full-ground record covers 31 men’s ODIs. It includes a 428/5 team total, a 90 all-out total, a highest successful chase of 282/7, and an almost perfectly balanced result split: 15 wins batting first, 15 wins batting second and one no-result. That is a record of changing match conditions and game situations, not evidence that the toss automatically determines the result. The ground identity and historical alias are cross-checked in the Howstat ODI ground overview and the ESPNcricinfo venue records.
This article keeps the ground record separate from a smaller scorecard sample. Howstat publishes a 246 first-innings average across all 31 ODIs, but the inspected full-ground overview does not publish a second-innings average. A separate, explicitly labelled 16-completed-match men’s ODI sample from the supplied Cricsheet archive averages 253.8 in the first innings and 197.0 in the second. The sample is useful for scorecard cross-checking and phase discussion, but it is not a replacement for the 31-match ground record or a complete historical census.
The next Delhi-city international is scheduled for 13 December 2026 at 2:00 pm IST: India vs Sri Lanka, the first ODI of Sri Lanka’s 2026/27 tour. The city is confirmed in the cited fixture lists, while a stadium is not named, so this should not be treated as a confirmed Arun Jaitley Stadium fixture. For the wider tour sequence, see the India vs Sri Lanka 2026 ODI and T20I schedule.
Delhi city match schedule
| Date | Match | Series | Time | Venue status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 December 2026 | India vs Sri Lanka, 1st ODI | Sri Lanka tour of India 2026/27 | 2:00 pm IST | Delhi confirmed; stadium not named |
Pitch statistics: full ground record and separate sample
The table below preserves the scope of each number. The 31-match figures are the primary ground record; the second-innings mean is shown as not published, not guessed from an incomplete archive. The 16-match line is a separate completed-scorecard calculation from male ODI JSON files. The 2009 no-result file with only one innings is excluded from that calculation.
| Metric | Full-ground ODI record (31 matches) | Separate Cricsheet men’s ODI sample (16 completed matches) |
|---|---|---|
| Matches in scope | 31 | 16 |
| Average first innings | 246 | 253.8 |
| Average second innings | Not published in inspected ground overview | 197.0 |
| Highest team total | 428/5 | Not used for this scope |
| Lowest team total | 90 | Not used for this scope |
| Highest successful chase | 282/7 | Not used for this scope |
| Wins batting first | 15 | Not a comparable ground-table field |
| Wins batting second | 15 | Not a comparable ground-table field |
| Ties | 0 | Not a comparable ground-table field |
| No-results | 1 | Excluded from completed-match mean |

What the results say about the Delhi pitch
The safest description is variable, with enough evidence for both substantial totals and difficult innings. South Africa’s 428/5 demonstrates that a side can convert a strong start into a very large total. The 90 recorded as the lowest total, and the 167–157 India-Pakistan contest, show the opposite end of the range. The 246 full-ground first-innings average is therefore a useful baseline, not a par score guarantee. The separate 253.8 sample first-innings mean points in the same broad direction, but its 197.0 second-innings mean should not be presented as the stadium’s official all-time chase average.
The even win split is equally important. A team setting a target has won 15 of the 31 completed-result matches, while a chasing team has also won 15; the remaining match was a no-result. That does not eliminate the importance of a good first innings, but it argues against a simplistic “bat first” or “chase at all costs” rule. Scoreboard pressure, wickets in hand and execution are likely to matter more than a slogan about the surface.
There is also evidence that bowling plans cannot be reduced to pace alone. The venue’s all-time wicket table includes Ravindra Jadeja, Harbhajan Singh and Adam Zampa, while Saeed Ajmal took 5/24 in the 2013 India–Pakistan ODI. Those results support giving spin a serious tactical place in the middle overs, while the broader score range warns that bowlers still need plans for a batting side that survives the early movement and builds momentum. This is historical reasoning, not a claim about the precise strip prepared for a future match.
Phase-by-phase match reading
Powerplay: The first phase should be read through wickets and platform rather than a fixed expected score. The 428/5 record shows the value of preserving resources after a productive start; the low totals show the cost when an innings loses early control. Batters can use the field restrictions to establish a base, but the historical spread makes early wicket preservation more informative than an aggressive benchmark detached from match context.
Middle overs: This is the phase in which Delhi’s wicket-taking spin record becomes relevant. The full-ground leaders include Jadeja with nine wickets and several bowlers with seven, and the archive of actual scorecards includes Ajmal’s five-wicket haul. That evidence supports changing pace, using spin to attack partnerships and forcing batters to manufacture risk. It does not prove that every future pitch will turn sharply; it supports a matchup-based middle-overs plan.
Death overs: The totals show that innings can accelerate decisively. A side that reaches the final phase with wickets in hand can push well beyond the 246 baseline, while a side already under pressure may have limited resources for a late surge. For a chasing team, the 282/7 successful chase shows that a target in that range has been achieved, but it should not be treated as a universal ceiling or guarantee. The key reading is wickets plus required rate, not a venue myth.
Recent actual ODI results at the ground
These scorecards illustrate the range more clearly than a single average:
- India vs England, 2011: England made 237 and India reached 238/2 in 36.4 overs to win by eight wickets. Virat Kohli finished 112 not out and Vinay Kumar took 4/30. See the India–England 2011 scorecard.
- India vs Pakistan, 2013: India scored 167 and Pakistan 157; India won by 10 runs, with Saeed Ajmal taking 5/24. See the India–Pakistan 2013 scorecard.
- India vs New Zealand, 2016: New Zealand posted 242/9 and India made 236, so New Zealand won by six runs. Jasprit Bumrah and Amit Mishra each took three wickets. See the India–New Zealand 2016 scorecard.
- India vs Australia, 2019: Australia made 272/9 and India were dismissed for 237, a 35-run Australian win; Bhuvneshwar Kumar took 3/48. See the India–Australia 2019 scorecard.
- Bangladesh vs Sri Lanka, 2023: Sri Lanka scored 279 and Bangladesh chased 282/7 in 41.1 overs, winning by three wickets with 53 balls remaining. Charith Asalanka made 108 and Maheesh Theekshana took 2/44. See the Bangladesh–Sri Lanka 2023 scorecard.
Exact-ground all-time ODI batting leaders
These are the top ten rows in the inspected venue-specific ODI table, not career rankings. Mohammad Azharuddin is correctly third with 267 runs. The average shown for Ricky Ponting is 81.66, as recorded in the supplied data.
| Rank | Batter | Country | Matches | Runs | 50s | 100s | Highest score | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sachin Tendulkar | India | 8 | 300 | 1 | 1 | 137 | 37.50 |
| 2 | Virat Kohli | India | 8 | 277 | 2 | 1 | 112* | 55.40 |
| 3 | Mohammad Azharuddin | India | 7 | 267 | 3 | 0 | 72* | 66.75 |
| 4 | MS Dhoni | India | 9 | 260 | 2 | 0 | 71* | 65.00 |
| 5 | Ricky Ponting | Australia | 3 | 245 | 1 | 1 | 145 | 81.66 |
| 6 | Dilip Vengsarkar | India | 4 | 209 | 3 | 0 | 63 | 52.25 |
| 7 | Rohit Sharma | India | 3 | 202 | 1 | 1 | 131 | 67.33 |
| 8 | R Lamba | India | 3 | 192 | 3 | 0 | 74 | 96.00 |
| 9 | Sourav Ganguly | India | 3 | 189 | 2 | 0 | 86 | 63.00 |
| 10 | Charith Asalanka | Sri Lanka | 2 | 187 | 1 | 1 | 108 | 93.50 |
Exact-ground all-time ODI bowling leaders
The following ten rows are the supplied venue-specific ODI wicket table. Wicket totals are not a prediction for the next match; they describe the ground’s recorded ODI history.
| Rank | Bowler | Country | Matches | Wickets | Economy | Average | Strike rate | Best bowling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ravindra Jadeja | India | 7 | 9 | 4.24 | 25.00 | 35.33 | 3/44 |
| 2 | Adam Zampa | Australia | 2 | 7 | 4.15 | 7.71 | 11.14 | 4/8 |
| 3 | Kemar Roach | West Indies | 2 | 7 | 4.18 | 9.85 | 14.14 | 6/27 |
| 4 | Jasprit Bumrah | India | 3 | 7 | 3.76 | 16.14 | 25.71 | 4/39 |
| 5 | Mohammed Shami | India | 3 | 7 | 4.21 | 16.57 | 23.57 | 4/36 |
| 6 | Harbhajan Singh | India | 5 | 7 | 3.48 | 21.42 | 36.85 | 5/31 |
| 7 | Ajit Agarkar | India | 3 | 7 | 5.93 | 24.57 | 24.85 | 3/58 |
| 8 | Viv Richards | West Indies | 1 | 6 | 4.24 | 6.83 | 9.66 | 6/41 |
| 9 | Pieter Seelaar | Netherlands | 2 | 6 | 4.90 | 16.33 | 20.00 | 3/45 |
| 10 | Zaheer Khan | India | 3 | 6 | 4.70 | 19.33 | 24.66 | 3/20 |
FAQs
Who has scored the most ODI runs at Arun Jaitley Stadium?
Sachin Tendulkar leads the inspected exact-ground ODI batting table with 300 runs in eight matches. Virat Kohli is second with 277, and Mohammad Azharuddin is third with 267.
Who has taken the most ODI wickets at the ground?
Ravindra Jadeja leads the exact-ground ODI table with nine wickets in seven matches. Seven wickets are recorded by Adam Zampa, Kemar Roach, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami, Harbhajan Singh and Ajit Agarkar.
Who has the highest individual ODI score in Delhi?
Ricky Ponting holds the highest individual score in the inspected full-ground record: 145 for Australia. That is distinct from Tendulkar’s aggregate lead of 300 runs.
What is the average ODI score at Arun Jaitley Stadium?
The verified full-ground figure is a 246 first-innings average across 31 ODIs. The inspected primary overview does not publish a full-ground second-innings average. Separately, the 16-completed-match men’s Cricsheet sample averages 253.8 in the first innings and 197.0 in the second; those sample figures must not be relabelled as the all-time ground averages.
Is spin important at the ground?
The evidence supports taking spin seriously, especially in the middle overs: Jadeja leads the wicket table, Harbhajan Singh is also among the top ten, Adam Zampa has seven wickets in two matches, and Ajmal’s 5/24 is a documented recent-era example. It remains historical evidence, not a guarantee about a future strip.
Sources and scope
Primary ground statistics are from Howstat’s Arun Jaitley Stadium ODI overview and its ODI match list. Player rows come from ESPNcricinfo’s most ODI runs at the ground and most ODI wickets at the ground tables. Recent scorecards are linked in the results section. The fixture status is from the BCCI release and ESPNcricinfo schedule. The separately scoped sample was calculated from the Cricsheet ODI archive after filtering to men’s ODIs and excluding the one-innings no-result.
More in this series: six-match tour schedule, Bengaluru Odi report, Ahmedabad Odi report.

5 Comments
Pingback: India vs Sri Lanka 1st T20I 2026
Pingback: Bengaluru ODI Pitch Report: Chinnaswamy Records
Pingback: Cuttack T20I Pitch Report: Barabati Stadium Records
Pingback: Pune T20I Pitch Report: MCA Stadium Records
Pingback: India vs Sri Lanka December 2026: 6 Big Series Questions